Commoditization: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:45, 29 October 2021

Revision as of 12:48, 7 November 2021

Line 6:

This is not to be confused with [[commodification]], which is the concept of objects or services being assigned an exchange value which they did not previously possess by their being produced and presented for sale, as opposed to personal use. One way to summarize the difference is that commoditization is about proprietary things becoming generic, whereas commodification is about nonsaleable things becoming saleable. In social sciences, particularly [[Cultural Anthropology|anthropology]], the term is used interchangeably with commodification to describe the process of making commodities out of anything that was not available for trade previously.<ref>Appadurai, Arjun, ed. (1986). ''The Social Life of Things: Commodities in a Cultural Perspective''. Cambridge UP, Cambridge.</ref><ref>Greenwood, D.J. (1977). "'Culture by the Pound: An Anthropological Perspective on Tourism as Cultural Commoditization". In ''Hosts and Guests'', ed. V. L. Smith, pp. 129-139. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.</ref>

'''[[Commoditization]]''' can be the desired outcome of an entity in the market, or it can be an unintentional outcome that no party actively sought to achieve. (For example, see [[Xerox#Trademark]].)

According to [[Neoclassical economics|Neo-classical economic theory]], consumers can benefit from commoditization, since perfect competition usually leads to lower prices. Branded producers often suffer under commoditization, since the value of the brand (and ability to command price premiums) can be weakened.