Revision as of 01:57, 8 November 2021 edit Caleb Stanford (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions 5,612 edits update Tag: 2017 wikitext editor ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:57, 8 November 2021 edit undo Caleb Stanford (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions 5,612 edits →Be more explicit about eventually-periodic case Tag: 2017 wikitext editor Next edit →
Line 23: ::::: Oh you are right about (ii), my mistake. OK, thanks for the discussion. [[User:Caleb Stanford\|Caleb Stanford]] ([[User talk:Caleb Stanford\|talk]]) 01:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC) Given that some definitions (see (ii) and the generating series definition) point to eventually-periodic sequences naturally being considered constant-recursive, I think I'm now somewhat inclined to allow <math>c_d = 0</math>. Also, it leads to a more general definition, in terms of many of the results (e.g. closure properties). For now, I edited the article with some clarifications to the definition. [[User:Caleb Stanford\|Caleb Stanford]] ([[User talk:Caleb Stanford\|talk]]) 01:57, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Constant-recursive sequence: Difference between revisions