Content deleted Content added
p[prgeohpojedohgjofhfigjeijojrhrohtorroyhjofhghfkjgkfhffjihhefhjldhgfpjgfpfjfu++++-+9996666666 Tag: Reverted |
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 91:
:::That's what I was thinking; I looked around and didn't see it in many places, so I don't think there are grounds for reverting the edit, but I see nothing wrong in principle with using a symbol not officially approved by the language designers. —[[User:GreenWeasel11|GreenWeasel11]] ([[User talk:GreenWeasel11|talk]]) 21:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
::::Ok, that's debatable. But if, say, a commercial implementation has a well-known logo, I don't think it's ok to put this logo on the programming language page, that is not limited to this commercial implementation. It's similar here: apparently the goal is to promote Ada in a business context, and this is not endorsed by the wider Ada community. A kind of POV-pushing, maybe. But if we all agree, for various reasons, that the logo should not be here, that's fine. [[User:7zz|7zz]] ([[User talk:7zz|talk]]) 12:52, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
fgigofiohgjiedjhgighjbgjgbfjgifbdfgbfjgfffbjjbvhvjvvmvbvbvvvvnbvnvvvbvnvvnvnvnjvvhvbb
| |||