Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 72.23.176.160 - "" Tag: Reverted |
Revert to revision 1054131386 dated 2021-11-08 07:15:32 by Cewbot using popups |
||
Line 4:
{{WikiProject United States|class=C|importance=Low|USGov=Yes|USGov-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Computer science|class=|importance=}}
}}
{{archives}}
== External links modified ==
Line 64:
[[User:Karl gregory jones|Karl gregory jones]] ([[User talk:Karl gregory jones|talk]]) 17:04, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
: It's a [[hyphen-minus]], to give it its Unicode name. It is the one and only ASCII character to be a horizontal line at x-height in the character cell. It is the dash in ASCII, among its multitude of duties.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] ([[User talk:Prosfilaes|talk]]) 04:17, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Line 91:
:::That's what I was thinking; I looked around and didn't see it in many places, so I don't think there are grounds for reverting the edit, but I see nothing wrong in principle with using a symbol not officially approved by the language designers. —[[User:GreenWeasel11|GreenWeasel11]] ([[User talk:GreenWeasel11|talk]]) 21:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
::::Ok, that's debatable. But if, say, a commercial implementation has a well-known logo, I don't think it's ok to put this logo on the programming language page, that is not limited to this commercial implementation. It's similar here: apparently the goal is to promote Ada in a business context, and this is not endorsed by the wider Ada community. A kind of POV-pushing, maybe. But if we all agree, for various reasons, that the logo should not be here, that's fine. [[User:7zz|7zz]] ([[User talk:7zz|talk]]) 12:52, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
| |||