Revision as of 11:19, 21 November 2021 edit 2a01:e0a:5d3:2650:51f0:f3d2:7d33:13d8 (talk) →Criticism section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:20, 21 November 2021 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,805 edits m Signing comment by 2A01:E0A:5D3:2650:51F0:F3D2:7D33:13D8 - "→Criticism section: " Next edit →
Line 107: > Functional programming is also key to some languages that have found success in specific domains, like JavaScript in the Web. This is rather opinionated and poorly reflected in the current state of the art in Javscript. Javascript tends to be massively used as OOP and not functional despite some trends going on. \\ <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2A01:E0A:5D3:2650:51F0:F3D2:7D33:13D8\|2A01:E0A:5D3:2650:51F0:F3D2:7D33:13D8]] ([[User talk:2A01:E0A:5D3:2650:51F0:F3D2:7D33:13D8#top\|talk]]) 11:19, 21 November 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> I've reverted the criticism section for now. I think a criticism section certainly is a good idea, but I don't really understand any of the points in the current one, and it doesn't have any references. If anyone can provide clarification or references for these points that would be much appreciated ({{ping\|35.137.225.220}}).

Talk:Functional programming: Difference between revisions