Content deleted Content added
m Open access bot: doi added to citation with #oabot. |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Add: s2cid. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Hippocampus (brain) | #UCB_Category 20/45 |
||
Line 11:
===Theta phase separation===
In a framework first developed by Hasselmo and colleagues, theta phase separation implies that the theta rhythm of the hippocampus occurs in cycles and various phases of the rhythm entail encoding and retrieval as separate processes.<ref name=c>{{cite journal | last1 = Hasselmo | first1 = ME | last2 = Bodelon | first2 = C | last3 = Wyble | first3 = BP | year = 2002 | title = A proposed function for hippocampal theta rhythm: separate phases of encoding and retrieval enhance reversal of prior learning | journal = Neural Computation | volume = 14 | issue = 4| pages = 793–817 | doi = 10.1162/089976602317318965 | pmid = 11936962 | s2cid = 9128504 }}</ref><ref name=m>{{cite journal | last1 = Kunec | first1 = S | last2 = Hasselmo | first2=ME | last3 = Kopell | first3 = N | year = 2005 | title = Encoding and Retrieval in the CA3 Region of the Hippocampus: A Model of Theta-Phase Separation | journal = Journal of Neurophysiology | volume = 94 | issue = 1| pages = 70–82 | doi = 10.1152/jn.00731.2004 | pmid = 15728768 | citeseerx = 10.1.1.333.5452 }}</ref> An extra-hippocampal structure, the septum, initiates and regulates the theta rhythm and its associated memory processes. GABAergic activity within the septum inhibits certain classes of CA3 cells (a region of the hippocampus), the divide often drawn between basket cells, pyramidal cells, and interneurons, to distinguish encoding from retrieval mechanisms. The study emphasizes and models the CA3 subfield of the hippocampus as a primary inducement towards encoding and retrieval. Encoding as a procedure begins when septal GABAergic inhibition is at minimum, freeing basket cells to act within CA3, and during brief dis-inhibition periods, other cells receive input: a proximal entorhinal input toward pyramidal cells and a coincident [[dentate gyrus]] input toward interneurons.<ref name=c /><ref name=m /> On the other hand, retrieval as a procedure begins when septal GABAergic inhibition is at maximum, occluding basket cell activity and enabling pyramidal cells to signal.<ref name=c /> During this period, Oriens- Lacunosum Moleculare (O-LM) cells disambiguate memory for retrieval.<ref name=m />
CA3 is significant as it is allows auto-associative processes through a recurrent, collateral system.<ref name=c /> The theta phase separation model agrees generally with others on the significance of CA3 but is the first to attribute both the processes of encoding and retrieval to the subfield.<ref name=c /><ref name=m />
Line 19:
The reconsolidation hypothesis claims that objects encoded into long term memory experience a new period of consolidation, or the time and resource expended to stabilize a memory object, upon each recollection. This is in opposition to the classical consolidation hypothesis which regards consolidation as a one-time event, following the first encoding of a memory. A memory item in this hypothesis, upon reactivation, destabilizes for a brief period and thereafter invokes the neuronal processes requisite for stabilization.<ref name=d>{{cite journal | last1 = Morris | first1 = R. G. M. | last2 = Inglis | first2 = J. | last3 = Ainge | first3 = J. A. | last4 = Olverman | first4 = H. J. | last5 = Tulloch | first5 = J. | last6 = Dudai | first6 = Y. | last7 = Kelly | first7 = P. A. T. | year = 2006 | title = Memory reconsolidation: Sensitivity of spatial memory to inhibition of protein synthesis in dorsal hippocampus during encoding and retrieval | journal = Neuron | volume = 50 | issue = 3| pages = 479–489 | doi = 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.012 | pmid=16675401| doi-access = free }}</ref>
The reconsolidation hypothesis has lingered since the 1960s; however, a 2000 study, entitled "Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval", examining fear conditioning in rats, has provided evidence in its favor.<ref name=e>{{cite journal | last1 = Nader | first1 = Karim | last2 = Schafe | first2 = Glenn E. | last3 = Le Doux | first3 = Joseph E. | year = 2000 | title = Fear Memories Require Protein Synthesis In The Amygdala For Reconsolidation After Retrieval | journal = Nature | volume = 406 | issue = 6797| pages = 722–726 | doi = 10.1038/35021052 | pmid=10963596| bibcode = 2000Natur.406..722N | s2cid = 4420637 }}</ref> After receiving post-retrieval an intra-amygdalar infusion of a known amnesic agent, anisomycin, rats failed to recall a rapidly learned fear memory.<ref name=e /> Hippocampal lesions formed post-retrieval affected the rats' fear conditioning in a similar manner.<ref name=e />
The reconsolidation hypothesis does not suppose that subsequent and precedent consolidation phases are necessarily identical in duration or in the neural mechanisms involved. Nevertheless, the commonality that exists in every consolidation phase is a short-lived destabilization of a memory object and a susceptibility for said object to react to amnesic agents—principally protein synthesis inhibitors.<ref name=d /> Morris and colleagues' experiment indicates that the reconsolidation hypothesis could apply to particular memory types such as allocentric spatial memory, which is either acquired slowly or rapidly. As implied by the authors, however, such an application is feasible only in the case of rapidly acquired spatial memory, the degree to which is influenced by how thoroughly a spatial object is trained.<ref name=d />
Line 47:
===Methods===
In an experiment performed by Zeineh and colleagues, ten subjects were scanned by fMRI while engaged in a face-name associative task that linked a sequence of faces unknown to the participants with the names of the individuals to whom they belonged.<ref name=j>{{cite journal | last1 = Zeineh | first1 = M | year = 2003 | title = Dynamics of the Hippocampus During Encoding and Retrieval of Face-Name Pairs | journal = Science | volume = 299 | issue = 5606| pages = 577–580 | doi = 10.1126/science.1077775 | pmid=12543980| bibcode = 2003Sci...299..577Z | s2cid = 2361898 }}</ref> The hippocampus is known to play a role in the encoding of memory that associates between a face and a name. The experiment began by dividing encoding blocks, in which the participants viewed and attempted to memorize the faces paired with the names, from retrieval blocks, in which the participants were shown only the faces and asked to match them with their names. This process was completed four times.<ref name=j /> Rote rehearsal was discouraged by a distractive task administered between encoding and recall blocks.<ref name=j />
===Results===
|