Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spatial complexity: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 07:25, 1 December 2021

Revision as of 07:26, 1 December 2021

Line 10:

*sad story with Wikipedia is repeating, people ignorant on a scientific subject express opinion on whether that subject is worth having in an encyclopedia or not. If you see the term "spatial complexity" in the references, it was obviously picked up by other scientists, it's not just the original coiner of that term. Also if you see publications, they're in notable scientific journals, where they're peer-reviewed by scientists, not by the average Joe. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2A02:2149:8AC0:100:2C93:8FBA:D31C:D084|2A02:2149:8AC0:100:2C93:8FBA:D31C:D084]] ([[User talk:2A02:2149:8AC0:100:2C93:8FBA:D31C:D084#top|talk]]) 06:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

**Well, my fav quote: ''Wikipedia editors and administrators do not need a degree in cosmic and particle science or quantum mechanics to apply Wikipedia policies.'' - user Kudpung

**:That quoted, the nomination is without merit per wikipedia policies, the nom didnt carry out due diligence, and is oblivious to the fact that AfD is not a cleanup. [[User:Loew Galitz|Loew Galitz]] ([[User talk:Loew Galitz|talk]]) 07:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC)