Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spatial complexity: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
ce |
|||
Line 11:
**Well, my fav quote: ''Wikipedia editors and administrators do not need a degree in cosmic and particle science or quantum mechanics to apply Wikipedia policies.'' - user Kudpung
*:That quoted, the nomination is without merit per wikipedia policies, the nom didnt carry out due diligence, and is oblivious to the fact that AfD is not a cleanup. [[User:Loew Galitz|Loew Galitz]] ([[User talk:Loew Galitz|talk]]) 07:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. This is someone throwing buzzwords together with no depth, backed up by an impressive list of references almost none of which are actually on the subject, to the extent that we can even discern what the subject is. The only real source (the Fivos P. book) has only one preprint citation in Google Scholar, so we are totally lacking the in-depth reliable coverage of his work that would make this pass [[WP:GNG]], even if it were reframed as an article about the book rather than an article about its fuzzy theories. There may be something real to write about measures of complexity of spatial structures, but nothing in this article contributes towards that, so beyond the failure of [[WP:GNG]], [[WP:TNT]] also applies. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 08:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
| |||