Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spatial complexity: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Loew Galitz (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Danstronger (talk | contribs) D |
||
Line 15:
*'''Delete'''. This is someone throwing buzzwords together with no depth, backed up by an impressive list of references almost none of which are actually on the subject, to the extent that we can even discern what the subject is. The only real source (the Fivos P. book) has only one preprint citation in Google Scholar, so we are totally lacking the in-depth reliable coverage of his work that would make this pass [[WP:GNG]], even if it were reframed as an article about the book rather than an article about its fuzzy theories. There may be something real to write about measures of complexity of spatial structures, but nothing in this article contributes towards that, so beyond the failure of [[WP:GNG]], [[WP:TNT]] also applies. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 08:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
*:I will take a look and maybe change the vote. {{ping|David Eppstein}} FYI, Fivos is a given name; Papadimitriou is a surname. SInce yuo have expertise in computational geometry, I am pretty sure you should have heard this surname. (I admit, on a quiock glance, I misread the name for"Papadimitriou, Christos" and desided that this person must have written something of note. Now, as I said, I am willing to reconsider my judgement. [[User:Loew Galitz|Loew Galitz]] ([[User talk:Loew Galitz|talk]])
*'''Delete''' "Spatial complexity" can mean a million different things, but they are largely unrelated to each other. This is not a case of one ''concept'' used in many fields, but one ''phrase'' (note [[WP:NOTDICT]]) used in many fields to mean different things, and for different purposes. The meanings discussed in the article and the Papadimitriou book are unrelated to the meanings used in almost all of the references. There is no underlying coherent concept here that is a suitable topic for an encyclopedia article. Perhaps a disambiguation page would be appropriate if multiple of the meanings of the phrase were notable, but that does not appear to be the case at this time. [[User:Danstronger|Danstronger]] ([[User talk:Danstronger|talk]]) 17:59, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
| |||