Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spatial complexity: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:15, 2 December 2021

Revision as of 03:02, 2 December 2021

Line 23:

**"spatial complexity is defined as the complexity of a spatial entity" - nothing wrong with this definition, and no, spatial complexity is '''not''' defined as the spatial complexity. [[User:Loew Galitz|Loew Galitz]] ([[User talk:Loew Galitz|talk]]) 22:29, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

***The "definition" is completely empty. It imparts no information to the reader. The different sources thrown into the page all define "complexity" in different ways, when they bother to give it even a semi-quantitative definition at all. This page offers nothing but an illusion of coherence. [[User:XOR'easter|XOR'easter]] ([[User talk:XOR'easter|talk]]) 00:25, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

****I already agreed the article sucks. I was going to fix it quickly, but decided it is easier to change my vote :-) By the way there is nothing wrong with apparently "empty" definition, as long as it is subsequently elaborated. Take orfor example "[[computationalComputational complexity]]": "the computational complexity or simply complexity of an algorithm is the amount of resources required to run it." I say it is just as empty as it can be, if taken in isolation. (What resources? electricity? sheets of paper? beer? ... ) Continuing to read the lede will not make you wiser. Some statements, are are gibberish andor even false in general. [[User:Loew Galitz|Loew Galitz]] ([[User talk:Loew Galitz|talk]]) 01:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)