Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spatial complexity: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Loew Galitz (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 27:
********Goodness gracious. You jumped in on '''December 3''' acvcusing me being a dick while I have changed my vote on '''decemberr 1''' already. Who is an obnoxious dick now? [[User:Loew Galitz|Loew Galitz]] ([[User talk:Loew Galitz|talk]]) 19:38, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
********* I'm ... not trying to get you to change your vote. Incidentally, while it's nice of you to prove me right like this, maybe next time don't. --[[User:JayBeeEll|JBL]] ([[User_talk:JayBeeEll|talk]]) 02:49, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
********** And you proved me right as well. YOU jumped into a discussion and started throwing accusations around. There are AfD discussions way longer than this one and people discuss each other's challenged calmly without calling each other dick. [[User:Loew Galitz|Loew Galitz]] ([[User talk:Loew Galitz|talk]]) 19:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Another example of the [[Bag-of-words model|bag-of-words problem]]: a couple ordinary words get smushed together to make a technical term, leading to countless false positives and the conflation of separate topics (i.e., [[WP:SYNTH]]). For example, the introduction says that spatial complexity is "eventually algorithmic", and the definition in the text (sourced to the 2020 book) insists that it is defined using either run-length encoding or edit distance. The [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.08.023 very next reference] uses none of these ideas, instead employing ideas from [[algebraic graph theory]] like the [[spectral radius]]. Ditto the [https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036139996306833 next reference after that]: once again, no algorithmic information, run-length encoding, or anything of the sort. It's all [[WP:REFBOMB]]-ing unrelated publications that happened to say "hey, this pattern looks complicated". There's no coherent subject here, no care put into the choice of references, and no text worth preserving. And I need to spare a moment for that opening sentence: "spatial complexity is defined as the complexity of a spatial entity" — so, spatial complexity is defined as the spatial complexity. [[Doge|Such spatial, very complex]]. [[User:XOR'easter|XOR'easter]] ([[User talk:XOR'easter|talk]]) 18:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
**"spatial complexity is defined as the complexity of a spatial entity" - nothing wrong with this definition, and no, spatial complexity is '''not''' defined as the spatial complexity. [[User:Loew Galitz|Loew Galitz]] ([[User talk:Loew Galitz|talk]]) 22:29, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
| |||