Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 82.71.14.214 - "→Translation: new section" |
|||
Line 397:
I am a native German and (UK) English speaker, so should someone be kind enough to forward me the original text, I shall do my best to translate it with a minimum of idiom, but an emphasis on the sense of the words, rather than a literal transcription, which seems to have been the case here. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.71.14.214|82.71.14.214]] ([[User talk:82.71.14.214#top|talk]]) 17:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
For instance, I might infer the following: -
In this work I have attempted to set forth the inferred original Indo-European language side by side with its extant derived languages. The advantages of this [approach] include making clear to students the results of the investigation in a consolidated form, thereby elucidating the nature of particular [particular individual?] Indo-European languages.
There is, I think, more to be gained by this, namely to demonstrate the baselessness of the assumption that the non-Indian Indo-European languages were derived from Old-Indian (Sanskrit).
| |||