Street hierarchy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 71:
 
A 2009 study <ref>Eric Dumbaugh and Robert Rae. Safe Urban Form: Revisiting the Relationship Between Community Design and Traffic Safety. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 75, No. 3, Summer 2009</ref> suggests that land use patterns play a significant role in traffic safety and should be considered in conjunction with the network pattern. While all intersection types in general reduce the incidence of fatal crashes, four-way intersections, which occur regularly in a uniform grid, increase '''total and injurious crashes''' significantly. The study recommends hybrid street networks with dense concentrations of T-intersections and concludes that a return to the 19th century gridiron is undesirable.
 
===Banning on-street parking===
Banning on-street parking can provide social benefits if the car users and the general public pay for off-street parking.<ref>[https://trid.trb.org/view/1567244] Transportation Research Board | On-street versus off-street parking: an urban economic analysis | Created: Nov 12 2018</ref><ref>[https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/saferjourney1/library/countermeasures/55.htm] Federal Highway Administration |On-Street Parking</ref><ref>[https://escholarship.org/content/qt3xj0q23z/qt3xj0q23z_noSplash_946f2e7b912e7cc9e71f98c81b3912d0.pdf] Shoup, Donald. "On-Street parking management v. Off-Street parking requirements." The access almanac 42 (2013): 38-40.</ref>
 
==Future prospects==