Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Einstein (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Replaced obsolete font tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 11:
:({{Find sources|Einstein (programming language)}})
This language fails to meet the general notability guideline. This is the *only* information I could find about the language: [http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/06/Einstein]. The link to its homepage from that article redirects to a company that doesn't even sell the product. [[User:Christopher Monsanto|Christopher Monsanto]] ([[User talk:Christopher Monsanto|talk]]) 00:00, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Cybercobra|<b
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Cybercobra|<b
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:NOTADVERTISING]]. Author could pretty much use his own userspace for this matter. There are lots of non-notable programming languages that appear every month. Some get fluctuating between low amount of users who keep using it from time to time. Definitely fails to meet guidelines to be kept as an article. [[User:Userpd|Userpd]] ([[User talk:Userpd|talk]]) 14:58, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
'''Keep''' because nothing good ever came of a deletion spree. [[User:Ubernostrum|Ubernostrum]] ([[User talk:Ubernostrum|talk]]) 03:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
| |||