Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FA Template Protection Bot: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:39, 1 November 2021

Revision as of 10:52, 16 January 2022

Line 133:

*Me too. See my cross post on bot policy. ":::I feel there is sufficient community for admin bots with BAG and crat approval, ie, without an RFA. However, I think these bots should run under their own account, not under the operator’s admin account. I also think that these bots should not be coded to unblock themselves—that I simply can not support. This weekend Maxim said he wanted to approve Cyde bot but I said I felt we weren’t quite ready to approve admin bots-I think FA bot needs to be settled first-and that I think these bots should run under separate accounts. I also think all existing admin bots that are not approved need to go through the BAG/crat approval process and be separated from their owner’s accounts." <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — [[User:Rlevse|<span style="color:#060;">'''''R''levse'''</span>]] • [[User talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 12:21, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

*<small> not a BAG member, but... Fully endorse the granting of +bot and +sysop to this bot. [[User:Happy-melon|<b style="color:forestgreen;">Happy</b>]]‑[[User talk:Happy-melon|<b style="color:darkorange;">melon</b>]] 12:39, 29 September 2008 (UTC)</small>

*Endorse. '''<fontspan facestyle="font-family:Arial;">[[Special:Contributions/Maxim|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#FF7133;">Maxim</fontspan>]]_{<small>[[User talk:Maxim|<fontspan colorstyle="color:blue;">(talk)</fontspan>]]</small>}</fontspan>''' 21:49, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

=== Bureaucrat comment ===