Talk:CounterPunch: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:15, 8 February 2007

Revision as of 17:18, 8 February 2007

Line 176:

Also, you were wrong in your paragraph that when you suggested that Cabal was defending Zundels views. Not once in the article does he at all endorse Zundel, he only says that it is wrong to jail a man for having unpopular views. I may disagree with Zundel, but I don't think he should be kidnapped and and locked away for that.

Will Beback, RolandR I am again extrememly sorry again for my tone and wish I could be more civil, but I am extremely frustated right now. I think you guys should talk to the unkown user from now on. To satisfy him add some things about Israel Shamir, because beleive it or not I actually believe counterpunch may have made a mistake in posting his writings. I still beleive the Zundel reference should be stricken form the article because it feels random and out of place in connection to the criticism of Atzmon and Shamir. I would prefer that any further rewrites be written by RolandR.

[[User:annoynmous|annoynmous]] 17:12, February 2007 (UTC)