Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Sgerbic questions: Reply |
→Sgerbic questions: Reply |
||
Line 45:
:::::The specific people we're talking about are parties. There is also organizationally the GSoW to consider. For now efforts to figure out who all is a member of GSoW doesn't feel necessary - if GSoW hasn't done anything wrong what difference does it make who is a member? In terms of how we are looking at the GSoW there has been a lot of attention given to the kinds of training being given (i.e. backwards editing) and whether there has been inappropriate attempts to coordinate efforts to manipulate Wikipedia processes (i.e. Article for Deletion discussions). So there are the actions of individuals, the actions of GSoW as a group, and potentially broader actions within the skepticism topic area to consider. [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 17:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
::::::So this is a giant non-trial against myself and a group of unknown editors? Arbcom is evaluating GSoW training based on one article I wrote years ago to a an non-GSoW audience. [[User:Sgerbic|Sgerbic]] ([[User talk:Sgerbic|talk]]) 18:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
:::::::I should add, a non-trail but evidence is being asked for, and there may be disciplinary sanctions. How is that not a trial? [[User:Sgerbic|Sgerbic]] ([[User talk:Sgerbic|talk]]) 18:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
| |||