Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Clarification on the scope: Reply |
|||
Line 8:
::Thanks for the quick replies, {{u|Johnuniq}} and {{u|Barkeep49}} :) [[User:A._C._Santacruz|A. C. Santacruz]] ⁂ [[User talk:A._C._Santacruz|Please ping me!]] 15:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
:So I'm confused - the accepts sure looked like the arbs wanted to restrict this to behavior of editors, and the case title is in line with that, but the case scope adds on "editing behavior," which basically expands the case to the entire topic area. We see this on the evidence page - mostly discussions of possible coordinated editing, but also two sections focusing on Roxy. So is the intent to examine behavior of the topic area as a whole now? [[User:GeneralNotability|GeneralNotability]] ([[User talk:GeneralNotability|talk]]) 01:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
::My section on Roxy is from discussions in the recent GSoW/COI/NPOV dust up, just diffs from outside of the few discussions I was outlining the issues with. I assume that keeps it topical. That's why I didn't include their incivility and edit warring over [[Ariel Fernandez]] in the same time period. [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 01:06, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
== Should Gronk Oz be added to the case as a party? ==
| |||