Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Scope?: Arbs, is the scope of this case is any editing behavior in skepticism topics whether or not the editors are involved in coordinated editing or is the scope of this case is coordinated editing in skepticism topics and the editing behavior of those doing the coordinated editing? |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
Line 116:
::::But if the scope of this case is coordinated editing in skepticism topics and the editing behavior of those doing the coordinated editing, where is the evidence that Roxy has engaged in coordinated editing?
::::Arbs, which of the above is the scope of this case? --[[User:Guy Macon Alternate Account|Guy Macon Alternate Account]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon Alternate Account|talk]]) 08:19, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
:::::Whether he is a member or not, the character of his actions and the context in which they happen makes me believe that there is no practical difference whether he's a 'card-carrying member' of GSoW or not when determining if his actions are co-ordinated with GSoW members. I wish to analyze that further in the Workshop as part of the evidence analysis but thought it best to do so after the deadline. If your only issue with the evidence provided so far is the Roxy case I think that the current scope fits the case. [[User:A._C._Santacruz|A. C. Santacruz]] ⁂ [[User talk:A._C._Santacruz|Please ping me!]] 08:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
| |||