How to Design Programs: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:57, 23 January 2022

Revision as of 17:22, 23 January 2022

Line 37:

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080511171056/http://www.ccs.neu.edu/scheme/pubs/jfp2004-fffk.pdf

|archive-date=May 11, 2008

}} a paper in which the authors compare and contrast HtDP with SICP.</ref> the same authors [[Matthias Felleisen]], [[Robert Bruce Findler]], [[Matthew Flatt]] and [[Shriram Krishnamurthi]] compared and contrasted the pedagogical focus of [[How to Design Programs]] (HtDP) with that of [[Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs]] (SICP). In the 14-page paper, the authors distinguish the pedagogic focus of HtDP from that of SICP, and show how HtDP was designed as a textbook to address some problems that some students and teachers had with SICP.

The paper introduces the pedagogical landscape surrounding the publication of SICP. The paper starts with a history and critique of SICP, followed by a description of the goal of the [[computing]] curriculum. It then describes the principles of teaching behind HtDP; in particular, the difference between implicit vs. explicit teaching of design principles. It then continues on to describe the role of [[Scheme (programming language)|Scheme]] and the importance of an ideal [[Computer programming|programming]] environment, and concludes with an extensive evaluation of content and student/faculty reaction to experience with SICP vs. HtDP.