Content deleted Content added
→To-do list from peer review (Jan 2022): notation done |
Eric Rowland (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 109:
=== Discussion ===
Post any comments below. [[User:Caleb Stanford|Caleb Stanford]] ([[User talk:Caleb Stanford|talk]]) 18:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
I disagree that <math>s_n</math> is preferable to <math>s(n)</math>. The OEIS — the definitive site for sequences on the internet — consistently uses <math>s(n)</math>, not subscripts (see https://oeis.org/A000045 for example). Also, sequences are functions, so <math>s(n)</math> is more appropriate and doesn't introduce extra notation. I don't see any possible cause of confusion. I think we should revert the recent change. [[User:Eric Rowland|Eric Rowland]] ([[User talk:Eric Rowland|talk]]) 00:21, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
| |||