Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
ArbCom statement of evidence for Sgerbic - Susan Gerbic |
→Evidence presented by Sgerbic: fussing as one does |
||
Line 587:
'''All this transpired over three days'''
Hopefully ArbCom understands why I am suspicious and wary of editors who zealously and suddenly enter the picture, making lists of GSoW editors, investigating on social media
Now to answer evidence
Line 631:
There has been some talk about me having a COI with CSI because I am a CSI Fellow. I encourage ABICROM to check the date I was made a Fellow, vs the date of my supposed COI diffs.
I have never been banned, rarely participated in admin conversations, and only want to continue training and improving Wikipedia science and pseudoscience pages. Wikipedia has brought me a community of hard working, truth loving nerds. The last thing I or the GSoW community would want is to hurt Wikipedia which makes all of this possible. At the end of the day, we have edited alongside everyone just like any other editor, as that is what we are, editors.
Thank you.
| |||