Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Evidence: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:54, 29 January 2022

Revision as of 23:20, 29 January 2022

Line 272:

Under [[WP:COI]], a COI can be formed by "any external relationship". Previously ArbCom found that COI "[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/BLP_issues_on_British_politics_articles#Conflicts_of_interest|also applies to conflicts that could cause unduly negative editing]]".

===GSoWGuerrilla isSkeptics are involved in off-wiki activism===

The main focus here are the GSoW "sting" operations targeting mediums to discredit them: [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/26/magazine/psychics-skeptics-facebook.html] [https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/operation-onion-ring-thomas-john-and-the-children/] [https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/click-click-click-thomas-john/] [https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/suzane-northup-operation-lemon-meringue/] [https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/operation-pizza-roll-thomas-john/] According to Sgerbic, they focus on psychics that "have enough notability to have a Wikipedia page". [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DN6Ol1KZNes&t=24s 2:30]

===GSoW editors have been editing BLPs where they have specific COIs due to their off-wiki activism===