Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Evidence presented by Gronk Oz: Expand on why "Guerrilla Skeptics" should not be confused with GSoW |
→Response to Bilby evidence: clarification |
||
Line 557:
===Response to Bilby evidence===
You (and others here) have conflated those who do stings, the Guerilla Skeptics, and those who work on WP, the GSoW.
===Response to ScottishFinnishRadish evidence===
*I was unaware of BLP rules applied to userspace, but have now reviewed the guidelines. I believe that the descriptions I used can be backed-up by material from the associated articles, but I have changed to less controversial descriptions anyway, and will be more careful in userspace.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rp2006&diff=1066575229&oldid=1066574904&diffmode=source][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rp2006&diff=1066576718&oldid=1066575857&diffmode=source][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rp2006&diff=1066574904&oldid=1066569173&diffmode=source]
| |||