Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Evidence: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:54, 30 January 2022

Revision as of 01:58, 30 January 2022

Line 511:

==Evidence presented by Johnuniq==

A lot of the evidence on this page shows what is already known, namely that GSoW exists. There is no evidence of edit warring other than a skirmish noted at [[#Dispute at Sharon A. Hill]] above. The only evidence of bad edits are those concerned with accurate but excessive BLP negativity regarding sting operations—Bilby [[#GSoW editors have been editing BLPs wheretargeted theyby havesting specific COIs due to their off-wiki activismoperations|listed examples above]]. However those examples are from 2015, 2019, 2020 with only two in 2021 (February + July). BLP problems are correctable—I am one of many admins who would ensure that such problems do not recur. I don't believe a community discussion would be needed, but if necessary there could be an RfC on whether BLPs should record sting operations.

Given claims that GSoW is a significant problem, there is remarkably little evidence of recent issues apart from bickering resulting from the 250 KB [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#User:Rp2006|COIN mega-discussion]]. Taking the evidence at [[#Links to articles on CSI and its affiliates]] as an example, the edits concerned are: 1 in 2014, 1 in 2015, 3 in 2016, 3 in 2017, 6 in 2018, 5 in 2019, 1 in 2020.