Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Fix broken anchor: 2022-01-30 #GSoW editors have been editing BLPs where they have specific COIs due to their off-wiki activism→Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Evidence#GSoW editors have been editing BLPs targeted by sting operations |
BilledMammal (talk | contribs) →References to CSI Publications: mention policy context |
||
Line 394:
[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism_and_coordinated_editing/Preliminary_statements#Statement_by_BilledMammal|Reviewing 100 of the articles with links to Skeptical Inquirer]], 54 were linked since 2018 of which 42 were by a GSoW associate. This disparity, combined with Gerbic's previous statements on this matter where she [https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/editing-backwards-gsow-and-skeptical-inquirer-magazine/ documents] a coordinated effort to add a reference to every article in an edition of SI, suggests a deliberate and coordinated effort to increase the exposure of CSI.
Considering these references in the context of [[WP:PARITY]], three addressed an existing unaddressed fringe claim, seven added and addressed a fringe claim such as at {{diff2|1001838330|Immune system}}, while eighteen were used within skepticism broadly defined but did were not related to fringe claims. Of the remaining fourteen, two were superfluous references, while twelve were used outside skepticism.
====Articles relating to CSI====
| |||