Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
BilledMammal (talk | contribs) |
→A. C. Santacruz’s behavior: added info and link |
||
Line 525:
*While I’m aware of [[WP:2WRONGS]], examples of instances of improper behavior by A.C.Santacruz are needed for context; she is a named party here and thus part of the scope. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism_and_coordinated_editing&diff=1067342403&oldid=1067342329]
*This started with a disagreement with A.C.Santacruz on the [[Sharon A. Hill]] article between her and three other editors, including me. Her edit concerned a large, seemingly unjustified deletion of a large block of text with 11 citations.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sharon_A._Hill&diff=1057018470&oldid=1055570570&diffmode=source] Confronted with the resistance to her deletion attempt, A.C.Santacruz then "investigated" me,
*But the damage was done. Before the purge, many read her posted info, which resulted in my (assumed) IRL identity being assumed as accurate, and openly discussed on at least one website. [https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=12429] Note that just 1 of the 11 citations involved alleged SelfCite material, which, in any case, another editor had added to the article long ago. This seems to have snowballed into claims that I generally engage in SELFCITING, and also have COIs with most anyone ever affiliated with CSI, (skeptics and scientists), and perhaps even the broader scientific/skeptic movement by extension. (See claims made by others here.)
| |||