Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Evidence: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:29, 31 January 2022

Revision as of 05:35, 31 January 2022

Line 525:

*While I’m aware of [[WP:2WRONGS]], examples of improper behavior by A.C.Santacruz are needed for context; she is a named party here and part of the scope.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism_and_coordinated_editing&diff=1067342403&oldid=1067342329]

*This started with a disagreement with A.C.Santacruz on [[Sharon A. Hill]] between her and three other editors, including me. Her edit concerned a seemingly unjustified deletion of a large block of text with 11 citations.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sharon_A._Hill&diff=1057018470&oldid=1055570570&diffmode=source] Confronted with the resistance to her deletion attempt, A.C.Santacruz then "investigated" me, took it to ANI[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#User:Rp2006] with a COI (should be SELFSITE) allegation, and attempted to OUT ([[WP:DOX]]) me. When I reported this violation to WP administration, they purged her posts. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sharon_A._Hill&diff=1060655895&oldid=1060654317]

*But the damage was done. Before the purge, editors read the info, resulting in my (assumed) IRL identity now being openly discussed.[https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=12429] Note that just 1 of the 11 citations involved alleged SELFCITE material, which, in any case, another editor had added long ago. This snowballed into claims that I generally engage in SELFCITING, and have COIs with most anyone ever affiliated with CSI, (skeptics and scientists), and perhaps even the broader scientific/skeptic community. (See claims by others here, including BilledMammal's complaint I edited [[Debunker]].)

*Her claims of contrition for the “unintentional” OUTING seems questionable due to her harassment of me on my Talk page, including a second OUTING attempt. (“the article that started this whole mess says Hill '''thanked him''' for an edit on her page”) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard?diff=prev&oldid=1063983684&diffmode=source]

*She justified her actions based on my lack of ‘taking proper precautions’: “How is it my fault they didn't take proper precautions before deciding to base the overwhelming majority of their edits in articles … I will never know.” [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:A._C._Santacruz&diff=1060686858&oldid=1060686488]

*Inappropriate behavior regarding the admin response: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sharon_A._Hill&diff=next&oldid=1060656391]

*She asked questions on my Talk page she characterized as "friendly," but which were not: "I'm being friendly and giving Rp an opportunity to disclose his association willingly before taking another route."[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rp2006&oldid=1063639958#On_Hill talk page] An admin responded, calling this “creepy” saying "There is no planet on which these questions would be regarded as friendly".[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rp2006&diff=1063489333&oldid=1063488436]