Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Evidence: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:35, 31 January 2022

Revision as of 05:37, 31 January 2022

Line 558:

===Response to Bilby evidence===

You (and others) conflated those who do stings (Guerilla Skeptics) with those who work on WP (the GSoW team). You made corrections, but others may have not.

===Response to ScottishFinnishRadish evidence===

*I was unaware that BLP rules applied to userspace, but have reviewed the guidelines. I believe that the descriptions I had used can be backed-up by material from the articles, but I have changed to less controversial descriptions anyway, and intend to be more careful in userspace.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rp2006&diff=1066575229&oldid=1066574904&diffmode=source][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rp2006&diff=1066576718&oldid=1066575857&diffmode=source][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rp2006&diff=1066574904&oldid=1066569173&diffmode=source]

*Regarding your complained here that “[he] calls DS/alert template harrassment”: I stand by that in this instance. I have edited BLPs extensively for many years, but the first time anyone ever added this to my page was in real-time during a dispute on the [[Thomas John (medium)]] page. Ironically I am the originator of this article. In context it seemed the intent was to scare me off, and win the edit argument. When challenged I was told it was just SOP. I did not observe the several editors representing the other side of the argument add this warning to one another’s pages. Hmmm.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rp2006&diff=1064633511&oldid=1064525606&diffmode=source]

===Conclusion===

*I was only able to address a portion of the evidence, but must note that it has been gathered by people going through my large body of work to find things to present negative things in support of their own POV. This is the epitome of [[Cherry picking]]. The examples usedExamples were selected from themy 13,200+ edits made over 6 years. This involves 1,880+ pages, ~67% in article space, with ~90% being still “live”. [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/Rp2006]

*My work includes writing two BLP Good Articles: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rp2006#My_two_%22Good_Articles%22], and in all I have created 7 articles from scratch, and substantially rewrote ~20 others.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rp2006#My_most_significant_articles] Six ran as DYKs in 4 separate years.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rp2006#My_six_DYK_articles]

Line 572:

*I have not been previously blocked/banned, and avoid admin issues/debates, preferring to spend my time actually improving and creating articles. In fact, I think this represents my first involvement with ArbCom, ANI or any other admin action since I created an account in 2006.

*When these facts are considered, I hope it is determined that an admin action against my WP account would be a net deficit to the WP project.

==Evidence presented by Sgerbic==