Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graffiti Blasters: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) Closing debate, result was keep |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 19:
*'''WEEEAAAK Keep''' Topicwise, I do not understand why it is encyclopedic at the international level. It seems like a local government program. However, {{u|Ethicoaestheticist}} has convinced me it is [[WP:N]] according to our guidelines.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 03:17, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. It's a local govt program, but it's one that's received wider coverage in several contexts. There is critical analysis/more than just passing mention in publications other than local news. And major coverage of one particular event. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 15:09, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||