Content deleted Content added
→top: repeat essential property as one answer to the notifiability challenge |
Adamant.pwn (talk | contribs) per comments on my talk page + one more source |
||
Line 1:
{{notability|date=February 2022}}
In linear algebra and ring theory, the '''Howell normal form''' is a generalization of the [[row echelon form]] of a matrix over <math>\Z_N</math>, the [[ring of integers modulo n|ring of integers modulo N]]. The
== Definition ==
Line 20:
== Properties ==
From this follows that for two matrices <math>A, B \in \Z_N^{n \times m}</math> over <math>\Z_N</math>, their row spans are equal if and only if their Howell normal forms are equal.<ref name=":0">{{harvp|Storjohann, Mulders|1998|pages=139-140}}</ref>
For example, the matrices
Line 41 ⟶ 43:
0 & 0 & 1
\end{bmatrix}.</math>
Note that <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> are two distinct matrices in the row echelon form, which would mean that their span is the same if they're treated as matrices over some field. Moreover, they're in [[Hermite normal form]], meaning that their row span is also the same if they're considered over <math>\Z</math>, the [[ring of integers]].<ref name=":0" />
However, <math>\Z_{12}</math> is not a field and over general rings it is sometimes possible to nullify a row's pivot by multiplying the row with a scalar without nullifying the whole row. In this particular case,
: <math>3 \cdot \begin{bmatrix}4 & 1 & 0\end{bmatrix} \equiv \begin{bmatrix}0 & 3 & 0\end{bmatrix} \pmod{12}.</math>
== References ==
{{Reflist}}
=== Bibliography ===
* {{Cite Q|
* {{Cite Q|Q110879586|ref={{harvid|Storjohann, Mulders|1998}}}}
* {{Cite Q|Q110883424|ref={{harvid|Biasse, Fieker, Hofmann|2017}}}}
[[Category:Matrix normal forms]]
|