Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Very high-level programming language: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m update username |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 19:
*'''Strong Keep''' More examples: [[SETL]] and [[ProSet]]. Google Books is ''awash'' with references on this topic [http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Very+High+Level+Languages%22&btnG=Search+Books&as_brr=0], it's a shame the nominator didn't do a little basic research before declaring a notable topic "blatant bullshit". If you disagree with one statement, then remove it or request a citation. As it happens, you're wrong - there is no reason why parsable natural language syntax cannot be used as as a programming language with a clever enough compiler or interpreter. --[[User:Canley|Canley]] 05:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
*Obvious '''keep'''. You can't say that VHLL don't exist or aren't notable when the ACM has a symposium on them!--[[User:OinkOink|OinkOink]] 06:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||