Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relationship Approach to Systems Development: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
WOSlinkerBot (talk | contribs) m Fix misnested tag lint errors |
||
Line 32:
*'''Delete'''. An object lesson in why editors with a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] should not write articles. [[User:Kim dent brown|<font face="century gothic" color="#339922">Kim Dent-Brown</font>]] [[User talk:Kim dent brown|<font face="century gothic" size="1" color="#339922"><sup>(Talk to me)</sup></font>]] 13:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
*Vehement '''delete'''. A classic example of [[WP:BOLLOCKS|complete bollocks]]. Indeed, my pathetic attempt to state the obvious in abstract, padded malarkey seems dull and uninspired compared to this masterpiece. Perhaps this is [[BJAODN]] material. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] 14:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', per many of the above arguments, esp. [[User:Kim dent brown]]. I'll change my !vote if the article is substantially rewritten to be more comprehensible to the average reader. At the very minimum, it needs a clear novice-level introduction explaining the notability of the subject. The details could be in an expert section. But it shouldn't be a [[WP:NOT#GUIDE|how to]] guide. [[User:Flyguy649|Flyguy649]] [[User talk:Flyguy649|<sup>talk
*'''Delete''', pile of VSCA. [[User:Iterator12n|Iterator12n]] <font color="Blue"><span style="font-size: 0.8em;"><sup>[[User Talk:Iterator12n|Talk]] </sup></span></font> 04:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', per the deletes above. [[User:Darrenhusted|Darrenhusted]] 12:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
| |||