Microsoft Visual SourceSafe: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Add: title. Changed bare reference to CS1/2. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by BrownHairedGirl | Linked from User:BrownHairedGirl/Articles_with_bare_links | #UCB_webform_linked 9/2195
Tag: Reverted
Line 66:
|}
 
==Criticism==<big>Big text</big>
Visual SourceSafe's stability is criticised due to the way Visual SourceSafe uses a direct, file-based access mechanism that allows any client to modify a file in the repository after locking it. If a client machine crashes in the middle of updating a file, it can corrupt that file.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms181079(VS.80).aspx|title=Best PracticeslPractices for Preventing Data Corruption|publisher=MSDN}}</ref> Many users of Visual SourceSafe mitigate this risk by making use of a utility provided by Visual SourceSafe that checks the [[database]] for corruption and, when able, corrects errors that it finds.
 
==Microsoft in-house use==