Content deleted Content added
→Final Thoughts and Suggestions: new section |
→Removing Weak Citations: new section |
||
Line 28:
Working on this stub article (which I have now noticed has been moved out of the stub section, so yay!) has been a great journey. I loved picking up information, reading up on original articles and also figuring out how to best present the information from research articles in a way wiki explorers and students could easily understand. So far, I have re-worked on the original contribution in terms of grammar and sentence restructuring. While I have not deleted any of the original contributor's content, I certainly added to the content, by first including a 'Backgrounds' section, and then an 'Applications' and 'Criticisms' section. I also actively worked on finding citations, adding credible sources to the article, verifying information. Finally, I re-worked on some sentence structures and added some finishing touches by resolving citations and missing links. I will still be looking to make slight changes to this article over the course of the next few days, but as mentioned earlier, this will only be minor. A majority of my contribution has now been completed. I very much enjoyed the work and am glad to see that the article has been removed from the stub category of Wikipedia! [[User:Teenytinyhooman|Teenytinyhooman]] ([[User talk:Teenytinyhooman|talk]]) 05:18, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
== Removing Weak Citations ==
Hi all! After finishing up my work and going through the final stages of proof-reading, I've realised that one of the citations in the 'Criticisms' section - citation [9], has a very low impact factor, and therefore I decided it was best to remove it so as to maintain the reliability of the article. Would welcome any suggestions or alternate papers for the same. Thanks! [[User:Teenytinyhooman|Teenytinyhooman]] ([[User talk:Teenytinyhooman|talk]]) 07:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
|