Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Community sanction: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Sean William (talk | contribs) |
→Informal Arbitration: example |
||
Line 44:
:it is supposed to be voluntary, yet binding. The bar to become a judge is open to discussion. To prevent the scenario that Durova brought up, there would be a Community Advocate who would ensure that, say in that scenario, 3RR is brought up. [[User:Geo.plrd|<font color= "blue">G</font>]][[User:Geo.plrd/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User_talk:Geo.plrd|<font color= "grey">o</font>]]. [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|<font color="blue">Talk to me</font>]] 03:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
::I don't think that people will flock to the idea of voluntary sanctioning. I imagine that people, when given the choice, will choose voluntary and non-binding mediation over voluntary and binding. [[User:PullToOpen|PT]][[User talk:PullToOpen|O]] 03:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
:::I am actually in (as a 3rd party) dispute right now in which the parties probably would have agreed to some type of non blocking/banning arbitration (as in article content only in decision). [[WP:RFArb#Free Republic]]. It would be rare though. [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 03:33, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
| |||