Content deleted Content added
m v2.04b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation) |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Add: title, date. Changed bare reference to CS1/2. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by BrownHairedGirl | Linked from User:BrownHairedGirl/Articles_with_bare_links | #UCB_webform_linked 1933/2189 |
||
Line 19:
| platform = [[JavaScript engine]], [[web browser]]
| genre = [[PDF viewer]]
| license = [[Apache License]] 2.0<ref>{{cite web |url = https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/blob/master/LICENSE |title = pdf.js/LICENSE at master · mozilla/pdf.js |website = [[GitHub]]|date = 17 February 2022 }}</ref>
| website = {{URL|https://mozilla.github.io/pdf.js/}}
}}
Line 33:
==Behavior==
According to one benchmark, PDF.js is performant for viewing most common PDF files, while it may have some issues with large or 'graphics-heavy' documents.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://hacks.mozilla.org/2014/05/how-fast-is-pdf-js/|title=How fast is PDF.js? – Mozilla Hacks - the Web developer blog}}</ref>
PDF.js supports most of the PDF specifications (including form support or [[XFA]]<ref>{{Cite web|title=1706133 - (pdf-xfa) [meta] XFA support|url=https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1706133|access-date=2022-01-28|website=bugzilla.mozilla.org|language=en}}</ref>) , but some features have not been implemented yet, which may impact rendering behavior depending on the features the document uses.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Guide to Evaluating PDF.js Rendering|url=https://pdftron.com/blog/pdf-js/guide-to-pdf-js-rendering/|access-date=2021-08-05|website=PDFTron}}</ref>
| |||