Nash embedding theorems: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Nash–Kuiper theorem ({{math|C1}} embedding theorem) {{anchor|Nash–Kuiper theorem}}: less subjective phrasing (which in my opinion is also more correct)
Line 19:
In particular, as follows from the [[Whitney embedding theorem]], any ''m''-dimensional Riemannian manifold admits an isometric ''C''<sup>1</sup>-embedding into an ''arbitrarily small neighborhood'' in 2''m''-dimensional Euclidean space.
 
The theorem was originally proved by John Nash with the condition {{math|''n'' ≥ ''m'' + 2}}. insteadHis ofmethod ''n'' ≥ ''m''+1 andwas generalizedmodified by [[Nicolaas Kuiper]], byto aallow relatively{{math|''n'' easy{{=}} trick''m'' + 1}}.{{sfnm|1a1=Nash|1y=1954}}{{sfnm|1a1=Kuiper|1y=1955a|2a1=Kuiper|2y=1955b}}
 
The theorem has many counterintuitive implications. For example, it follows that any closed oriented Riemannian surface can be ''C''<sup>1</sup> isometrically embedded into an arbitrarily small [[ball (mathematics)|&epsilon;-ball]] in Euclidean 3-space (for small <math>\epsilon</math> there is no such ''C''<sup>2</sup>-embedding since from the [[Gaussian curvature#Alternative formulas|formula for the Gauss curvature]] an extremal point of such an embedding would have curvature ≥ &epsilon;<sup>−2</sup>). And, there exist ''C''<sup>1</sup> isometric embeddings of the hyperbolic plane in '''R'''<sup>3</sup>.