Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta) (bot |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta) (bot |
||
Line 524:
Also, is it necessary to have the "WPBannerMeta/hooks/qualitycats" hook in the template? It does not seem to be doing anything. Where does it apply to?
Thanks in advance! --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 00:26, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
== Protected edit request on 19 August 2021 ==
{{edit fully-protected|Template:WPBannerMeta/importancescale|answered=yes}}
Please sync with [[:Template:WPBannerMeta/importancescale/sandbox]] ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AComparePages&page1=Template%3AWPBannerMeta%2Fimportancescale&page2=Template%3AWPBannerMeta%2Fimportancescale%2Fsandbox diff]). This is a minor edit that gets these pages off of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:LintErrors/stripped-tag&namespace=10 this Linter report]. We're trying to eliminate as many errors from Template space as possible, no matter how trivial. And boy howdy, is this one trivial!
It's gnomey, I know. I would do it myself, but I do not have or want permissions to edit fully protected pages. Thanks. – [[User:Jonesey95|Jonesey95]] ([[User talk:Jonesey95|talk]]) 00:47, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
:{{admin note}} - up to 10,000,000 pages use this - {{ping|Jonesey95}} want to be very careful. Any benefit you see to noincluding the page on itself vs including extra table tags on that? — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 11:02, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
::Sorry, I do not understand your question. The requested template has {{tag|tr}} tags without opening and closing {{tag|table}} tags, which confuses the Linter. When it is properly transcluded, it does not appear to cause any errors, but because the template is a syntactically incomplete fragment, it shows up on the error list. I have used this technique on dozens of fragment templates without issue (see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:ONintfiller&diff=prev&oldid=1038760041 this edit] for an example), and I expect that it will work here in the same way. There are a handful of templates in this family that are on the same report, and I expect that we could remove them from the report with similar techniques. A side benefit of adding these noincludes is that it often makes the template fragment display better on its own page. – [[User:Jonesey95|Jonesey95]] ([[User talk:Jonesey95|talk]]) 15:09, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
:::There's the option to {{tag|includeonly}} the whole template rather than adding the table tags in noinlcudes. Using the table tags means that the template is still visible to those looking at it directly. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 15:29, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
::::If that works, it would be fine with me as well. – [[User:Jonesey95|Jonesey95]] ([[User talk:Jonesey95|talk]]) 21:52, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:EP --> I have made the requested change — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 08:25, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
| |||