Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments by Bilby: Reply |
→Comments by A. C. Santacruz: Reply |
||
Line 19:
== Comments by A. C. Santacruz ==
* The proposed remedy on GSoW membership recommends a well-publicized discussion happen but does not outline where it would be best to hold the discussion (as opposed to RfC on SI, which Arbcom suggests happen at RSN). I think outlining what noticeboard or talk page would be best for this discussion would be helpful. [[User:A._C._Santacruz|A. C. Santacruz]] ⁂ [[User talk:A._C._Santacruz|Please ping me!]] 22:36, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
*:Usually, the kinds of places might be the appropriate [[WP:VP]] or the talk page of the relevant policy or guideline. I'd probably personally tend to the appropriate VP for this remedy since it lies at an intersection of a couple of policies and guidelines. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 23:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
== Comments by Bilby ==
| |||