Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments by Bilby: Reply |
|||
Line 42:
# Does pseudoscience DS apply to the topics of skeptics, skepticism, and psychics?
[[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 00:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
:Re #1: A reasonable argument could well be made that more gradation is needed, and I'm open to arguments that it's necessary. How important do you think it really is in the long run? The ArbCom FoFs and remedies should be sufficient in the event of any further threads on the users, and honestly, their conduct was somewhat peripheral to the core questions involved in this case. But I'm open to being persuaded. '''[[User:L235|KevinL]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 00:52, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
== Comments by {username} ==
| |||