Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 46:
:Re #1: A reasonable argument could well be made that more gradation is needed, and I'm open to arguments that it's necessary. How important do you think it really is in the long run? The ArbCom FoFs and remedies should be sufficient in the event of any further threads on the users, and honestly, their conduct was somewhat peripheral to the core questions involved in this case. But I'm open to being persuaded. '''[[User:L235|KevinL]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 00:52, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
::I think no reminder is fine in ACS's case, as her behavior wouldn't raise eyes in any discussion I've seen. There was plenty of other low key incivility and heated discussion that didn't warrant a reminder, her's was more of that. [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 00:56, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
| |||