Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 48:
::I think no reminder is fine in ACS's case, as her behavior wouldn't raise eyes in any discussion I've seen. There was plenty of other low key incivility and heated discussion that didn't warrant a reminder, her's was more of that. [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 00:56, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
::Also, in response to your comment on the Roxy remedy, I don't think warnings or admonishments are actually more stern. Either they're on notice from arbcom, or they're not. Whichever verb you choose doesn't much matter. [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 01:04, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
:::You are of course welcome to see it as you wish. But if ArbCom is stating "this behavior is worse than this other behavior and the way we're saying that is by using these different words" that doesn't change the fact that ArbCom is saying that one set of behavior is worse than the other even if they're all "on notice". [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 01:09, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
| |||