Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments by Gronk Oz: Reply |
|||
Line 37:
:"Skepticism topics, broadly construed", in my opinion does indeed include the scope at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism|WikiProject Skepticism]]. "Skeptical trade publications" is much narrower and specifically describes publications using the "skeptic" label or are otherwise ''closely'' linked with [[scientific skepticism]]. Do you think that's still ambiguous? '''[[User:L235|KevinL]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 00:54, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
:I agree with L235's takes. I'd be willing to consider and propose something of lesser scope than that described at the WikiProject, perhaps 'scientific skepticism' or 'the skeptical movement' as defined at 'scientific skepticism'. That said, the WikiProject itself only claims some 5k articles of interest to it, and I doubt many of the legitimate sciences are all covered by the project. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 01:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
==Comments by ScottishFinnishRadish==
| |||