Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments by Gronk Oz: Reply to both responders |
|||
Line 58:
:# My observation is that the committee and community would rather have DS which are fewer in number and lesser in scope, and adding scope to an existing DS did not look necessary additionally per #3.
:I cannot speak for the other drafters regarding item 3. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 01:10, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
::On the topic of BLPs, maybe a reminder/warning/admonishment to Rp2006 about that. That behavior, in my eyes, was at least as bad as the incivility and battleground conduct. [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 01:24, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
| |||