Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
comments in your own section please.
Line 39:
:I agree with L235's takes. I'd be willing to consider and propose something of lesser scope than that described at the WikiProject, perhaps 'scientific skepticism' or 'the skeptical movement' as defined at 'scientific skepticism'. That said, the WikiProject itself only claims some 5k articles of interest to it, and I doubt many of the legitimate sciences are all covered by the project, so I would suggest that every kind of valid science is probably not of broad interest in context. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 01:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
::(ec) Thanks for the clarification. I'm happy with the description of the publications. If the topic bans on skepticism are intended to include the entire field of science, that seems excessive - I think Izno's suggestion is more in line with the scope of the case.--[[User:Gronk Oz|Gronk Oz]] ([[User talk:Gronk Oz|talk]]) 01:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
:::Science Based Medicine? Where would that fall? [[User:Sgerbic|Sgerbic]] ([[User talk:Sgerbic|talk]]) 01:25, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 
==Comments by ScottishFinnishRadish==
Line 65 ⟶ 64:
I was a little surprised not to see a remedy related to principle 8, Editor groups with restricted membership. I see the proposal to confidentially provide a list of members, but that does not address the finding about the general unacceptability of such groups. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:DGG|DGG]] ([[User talk:DGG#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/DGG|contribs]]) </span>
:{{re|DGG}} What kind of remedy were you hoping for? My sense is the Committee is not going to prohibit GSoW from existing. Best, '''[[User:L235|KevinL]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 01:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 
== Comments by Sgerbic ==
<small>{{clerk note}} Moved from {{section link|#Comments by Gronk Oz}}</small>
:::Science Based Medicine? Where would that fall? [[User:Sgerbic|Sgerbic]] ([[User talk:Sgerbic|talk]]) 01:25, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 
== Comments by {username} ==
 
== Comments by {username} ==
 
== Comments by {username} ==