Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments by Gronk Oz: Reply |
|||
Line 39:
:I agree with L235's takes. I'd be willing to consider and propose something of lesser scope than that described at the WikiProject, perhaps 'scientific skepticism' or 'the skeptical movement' as defined at 'scientific skepticism'. That said, the WikiProject itself only claims some 5k articles of interest to it, and I doubt many of the legitimate sciences are all covered by the project, so I would suggest that every kind of valid science is probably not of broad interest in context. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 01:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
::(ec) Thanks for the clarification. I'm happy with the description of the publications. If the topic bans on skepticism are intended to include the entire field of science, that seems excessive - I think Izno's suggestion is more in line with the scope of the case.--[[User:Gronk Oz|Gronk Oz]] ([[User talk:Gronk Oz|talk]]) 01:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
:::And adjusted to scientific skepticism, with relevant link. If another arb wants to propose the still-narrower skeptical movement TBAN I have no qualms. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 01:51, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
==Comments by ScottishFinnishRadish==
| |||