Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments by Gronk Oz: Reply |
|||
Line 61:
::On the topic of BLPs, maybe a reminder/warning/admonishment to Rp2006 about that. That behavior, in my eyes, was at least as bad as the incivility and battleground conduct. [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 01:24, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
:::I can take another look but my recollection is that much of the BLP stuff was older and we tried to focus on newer stuff. Best, '''[[User:L235|KevinL]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 01:46, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
::::Well, there was restoring a BLPvio to the lead of [[Thomas John (medium)]], the BLPvios on the talk page of that article, the BLPvios on their talk page. That was all recent. I'm pretty sure that was all in my evidence. [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 02:03, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
| |||