Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments by Sgerbic: responding to KevinL |
|||
Line 71:
<small>{{clerk note}} Moved from {{section link|#Comments by Gronk Oz}}</small>
:::Science Based Medicine? Where would that fall? [[User:Sgerbic|Sgerbic]] ([[User talk:Sgerbic|talk]]) 01:25, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Per '''[[User:L235|KevinL]]''' on GSoW training: Background (8) I think you hit the nail on the head in your first two comments about our retention and community. While every volunteer group has issues with staying power - we have had pretty good success. On (9) we aren't novices anymore. Some of the team are tens of thousands of edits in, good articles, DYK and hundreds of pages written. Our work speaks for itself, KevinL you saw some of the work from a few of the team in the Evidence stage. We understand that "consensus can be established only on-wiki." We make the article live, and the page stands on its own merit or it does not, we can't force a page to exist when it is not notable. Skill comes from doing, and GSoW is doing a lot of doing.[[User:Sgerbic|Sgerbic]] ([[User talk:Sgerbic|talk]]) 02:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
== Comments by {username} ==
| |||