Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments by Rhododendrites: Reply |
|||
Line 222:
TL;DR - By stating that "groups" should disclose their members, you're creating significant privacy concerns based on a poorly defined principle, and creating a basis for ill treatment of groups/members who do not disclose. It will do more harm than good. — <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 04:14, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
:{{re|Rhododendrites}} When I drafted that principle my intention was actually to say that groups are encouraged to ''allow anyone to join''{{snd}}indeed I used your group and affiliates like it as an example, as you allow any Wikimedian in good standing to join. I recognize that could be ambiguous though. Best, '''[[User:L235|KevinL]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 06:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
== Comments by {username} ==
| |||